skip to main |
skip to sidebar
The Global Warming Doctrine is an ideology, if not a religion, which lives more or less independently of the science of climatology. Climate and temperature are used or more often misused in an ideological conflict about human society.
This doctrine, this new incarnation of environmentalism, is not a monolithic concept that could be easily structured and summarized. It is a flexible, rather inconsistent, loosely connected cascade of arguments, which is why it has so successfully escaped the scrutiny of science. It comfortably dwells in the easy and self-protecting world of false interdisciplinarity.
Everyone should read this - he knows what he's talking about: http://www.quadrant.org.au/magazine/issue/2011/9/climate-change-the-dangerous-faith
1 comments:
John, I don't think this is well argued. You start by suggesting advocates are non-scientists 'independent' of science, then they are intertwined.
The problem is that the scientific method is based on correlation. That is why its easy for them to dupe people. Its partial science that need not achieve causation. The last step of integration is omitted.
Post a Comment